My research explores how national history and other narratives about one's ingroup can structure modern political attitudes and behavior. How do parties use narratives about the past, and what are their consequences? I mostly examine this question in the context of far right party politics in Europe and the United States. My dissertation project investigates the conditions under which authoritarian history acts as an electoral obstacle or resource for the far right. Additional and past projects have explored topics related to victimhood perceptions, far right electoral breakthrough, and multiple projects related to party strategies, communication, and positioning.
I use both quantitative and qualitative methods in my research. I have field experience interviewing political elites in Spain and doing archival work in Spain and Italy. I also have experience designing and carrying out survey experiments, working with large observational datasets, using multiple machine learning techniques to analyze data.
A copy of my CV can be found here.
Collective victimhood and conflict-attitudes: Results from 12 Quasi-experiments using Holocaust Memorial day in Israel (with Nadav Shelef)
A meta-analysis of the impact of collective victimhood (with Nadav Shelef and Marko Kljajic)
Transitional justice and support for linked parties (with Laia Balcells)
Discounting extreme positions: Party normalization and support for the far right (with Laia Balcells and Sergi Martínez)
Party communication across and within borders on Twitter (with Younghyun Lee)
Populism and the Pandemic: France and the Rassemblement National
In a book chapter on populist reactions to the pandemic and cross-national report on social media communication, both co-authored with Marta Lorimer (LSE), we explore the rhetoric and actions Marine Le Pen and her Rassemblement National (RN) party throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic. In both pieces, we argue that Le Pen and the RN engaged in a careful strategy of balancing respectability and radicalization. The strategy fits well with the party's attempt to 'de-demonize' itself, a choice driven largely by incentives present in the French electoral system.
Turning right? Party position change on immigration in the European 'Refugee Crisis'
In a policy brief, I assess the whether and how differential levels of migration throughout the so-called European 'Refugee Crisis' induce parties to shift positions on immigration. While existing studies assess how party systems transform with long-term demographic shifts, little work explores the effect of short-term shocks to levels of diversity. Using basic OLS modeling and an instrumental variable (IV) strategy, findings suggest that higher exposure to racial diversification at the national level induced restrictive shifts in immigration positions only among center-right parties throughout the crisis. I make sense of these findings by considering incentives that parties when pressured to confront an issue.
Ending the Spanish Exception: Explaining the Rise of Vox
My undergraduate senior thesis in Government addresses the rise of a radical right party in Spain. In 2019, Vox—a previously unrepresented party in the national parliament—became the third largest party in the Spanish parliament. Drawing on both quantitative analysis and qualitative interviews conducted with regional party representatives in Spain, the thesis addresses the rise of Vox by discussing the various political opportunities that the party capitalized on. I argue that opportunities present in Spanish formal institutions, the party system, and short-term contextual events created a favorable moment for a radical right party to emerge when it did. The thesis argues that it this combination of opportunities that pushed Vox to break into the party marketplace. Perhaps most relevant to this emergence, the thesis argues, was its ownership over the issue of immigration. The thesis sought to add to the vast literature on radical right party emergence while focusing on a relatively new case.
The thesis can be found here.